On May 6, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Paul McNett <[email protected]> wrote: > We should rewrite dabo's dCursor and dBizobj to be native iterators, and get > rid of the next(), prior(), etc. but barring that renaming next() seems > necessary. Unfortunately, this will likely break user code.
I’m not sure why that’s needed. We increase/decrease the RowNumber, which does all sorts of related updates. I don’t see why that would be a problem with any dbapi-compliant cursor. -- Ed Leafe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
