Ed and Paul,
Thanks for your responses...
I need evaluate your comments, because right now I'm codding a big
Application and I need to know the impact of the migration into Dabo.
I expend the weekend for that work.
Thanks!!
El mié, 30-11-2005 a las 11:24 -0800, Paul McNett escribió:
> Ed Leafe wrote:
> > I would *not* recommend that you go with the AppWizard to do the
> > sort of custom things that you want to do. It would make much more
> > sense to create your app by hand; it may take a little more time
> > initially, but it will a) give you much more flexibility and b) give
> > you a better understanding of how Dabo works, which will enable you to
> > create better apps.
>
> Well... at least take a look at the AppWizard, and try it out. If it gets you
> close then you just saved a bunch of time. Even if it just gives you a useful
> skeleton, you are in better shape than starting completely from scratch. I
> think
> the key point that Ed is trying to make is: you are going to have to learn
> the
> code, and get comfortable with syntax and semantics to be effective. Use the
> AppWizard as a tool, but you'll still have to look at, modify, and add to the
> generated code.
>
> Regarding the "is Dabo stable" question, IMO it depends on your meaning of
> stable. I consider "stability" in this context to mean "to what extent is the
> API set in stone?" Dabo is at 0.5, most of the core API is in place and
> "stable", but things do change and nothing is really guaranteed to be
> unchanging
> yet. We do make changes semi-regularly that require at least a minimum of
> rewriting in our client apps. For the most part, though, you can be
> reasonably
> sure that code you write in Dabo today will still work fine when 1.0 is
> released.
>
______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!
Nuevos servicios, m�s seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
