On 4/4/07, Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ed Leafe wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2007, at 12:57 AM, Carl Karsten wrote: > > > >> I both agree and disagree with the current replies :) > >> > >> to use dabo's Biz objects, you need a data object to talk to that > >> conforms to > >> dabos Data tier api. you 'can' create such a thing, but it may be > >> be quite a > >> bit of work. (and assuming that the dabo tiers are well separated, > >> which I > >> think they are) > > > > One of the reasons I wrote the Bubblet demo was to show how to use > > bizobjs without a database; they are simply rule repositories. There > > is no need to use the data tier with bizobjs. > > > > In this case, there is a semblance of a data tier, >
I see a data tier, not a semblance. The data tier doesn't have to retrieve data from a database, as long as it conforms to the API standards of the layer. > Why semblance? > > > but not an dbapi- > > type one. So the communication with the "data tier" will have to be > > coded, but the advantage of separating logic from presentation can > > still be achieved. > > Does the data tier have to be an dbapi-type one for the dabo biz objects to > interact with? Maybe we need to document the layer API? That way then the data backend shouldn't matter. > > I would not expect to have to change any BO code, just write a ton of data > handling code. actually, it is read only, so only about a quarter ton. > > Carl K > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users > Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users > This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
