Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 1, 2007, at 3:23 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> self.setAll("Enabled", ok2edit ,filt="Class == RAClasses.RATextBox and
>> BaseClass == dabo.ui.dTextBox and Editable==False")
>
> The code for setAll() reads:
>
> for kid in kids:
> ok = hasattr(kid, prop)
> if ok:
> if filt:
> ok = eval("kid.%s" % filt)
>
> So we're evaluating the passed filter expression as if it were a
> single property. Your expression would result in:
>
> kid.Class == RAClasses.RATextBox and BaseClass == dabo.ui.dTextBox
> and Editable==False
>
> Clearly, that's not going to work.
>
> Perhaps this could be changed to allow passing a tuple, with each
> element being compared in the manner that the current code works. So
> instead of what you wrote, it would look like:
>
> self.setAll("Enabled", ok2edit ,filt=("Class is RAClasses.RATextBox",
> "BaseClass is dabo.ui.dTextBox", "Editable isFalse"))
>
> Does that look like something that would work for you?
I like that better than my %(o)s thing.
Editable isFalse ?
Carl K
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
