Paul McNett wrote: > Ed Leafe wrote: >> Our design is extremely smart and effective. All Dabo users should >> be strongly encouraged to work with the framework, not against it. >> Just because someone like Uwe insists on paddling upstream >> unnecessarily doesn't mean we should ever encourage anyone else to do >> the same. > > Agreed about our smart and effective design. I was simply saying that it > may not hurt to put a sidenote in the docs to explain to Pythonistas why > it is done this way, and that it would theoretically work to override > __init__, as long as the developer knows what they are doing.
I forgot to mention a use-case for overriding __init__ that I think is valid even though I just conjured it up: If someone is converting from pure-wx over to Dabo, and they already have lots of code in __init__, it probably makes sense for them to keep their code in __init__, at least initially, so they get something that works at first, with the intent to refactor later. -- pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
