Paul McNett wrote: > Uwe Grauer wrote: >> Ed Leafe wrote: >>> Just an informal survey: how many people out there are using Python >>> versions *earlier* than 2.5? And out of those, how many would not be >>> able to upgrade, or would not want to upgrade? Please explain why >>> upgrading would not be possible/desirable. >>> >>> If you are using Python 2.5, or are planning on upgrading real soon >>> now, please don't respond. I'm just trying to get an idea of the >>> issues that are preventing or discouraging people from moving from >>> older versions. >>> >> At least python 2.4 should be supported. >> I know that there are still very much people on 2.3 but i think this >> should be a minor incompatibility. > > We are trying to find out if requiring python 2.5 would be an > insurmountable hardship or not. Usually, we'd like to support python 1-2 > versions prior to the current version, but we are considering putting > something into place that would require python 2.5 (absolute import). > > So, not thinking of other people, will *you* be troubled if we make python > 2.5 a requirement? >
I wouldn't be troubled, because i'm able to build my own python for other uses. I fact, i do have two different python versions for things which still do not work with python 2.5. Other people who can't do this would be troubled because there still is a lot of stuff depending on python 2.4. Uwe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
