Brendan Barnwell wrote:
> johnf wrote:
>> On Wednesday 12 September 2007 19:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Nate,
>>> That's exactly what I came up with. We were just wondering if that was the
>>> only way to do it.
>>>
>>> What's cool about this is I can refer to the object by doing the
>>> following...
>>>
>>> for i in range(1, 10):
>>> exec("o=self.biz%s = dabo.biz.dBizObj()" % i)
>>> o.CurrentSql=....
>>> o.do_something_else
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Larry Long
>>>
>>> p.s If I executed the code above, does
>>> o=None
>>> Release the bizobj? I don't think it does. if not, then how can I release
>>> it?
>>>
>> Don't you like Brendan Barnwell solution better - using setattr()?
>> John
>
> Actually, I think an even better solution would be to not set the
> attributes at
> all, but use a dictionary (or, in this case, even just a list). Instead of
> doing
>
> for i in range(1, 10):
> setattr(self, "biz%s" % i", dabo.biz.dBizObj)
> o.CurrentSql=....
> o.do_something_else
>
> . . . do it this way:
>
> self.bizObjs = {}
> for i in range(1,10):
> self.bizObjs[i] = dabo.biz.dbizObj()
>
> Then access them with self.bizObjs[i] instead of self.bizObj1, self.bizObj2,
> etc.
>
Attention.
I you do this, don't expect that Dabo works as it should any more.
Uwe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
