Ed Leafe wrote: ... > This of course did not work, due to the inability to use aliases in > the having clause. Obviously the actual statements in the 'case' were > not so trivial, and it ended up being about 30 lines. In order to > filter the final result set, I would have had had to repeat the entire > 'case' structure for the having clause. That was just plain stupid, so > I wrote it like this: ...
Maybe it helps to read another explanation. This was a reply from the firebird-support group: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/message/92493?l=1 Uwe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
