Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 2008-05-27 um 19:10 schrieb Adrian Klaver: >>> I second the recommendation for sqlite. Much simpler. However, it is >>> functionally single-user and for large datasets a dedicated server >>> will >>> be better. >> One caveat about SQLite. It is has become popular as an embedded >> database. Ubuntu for one uses it to store information. The problem >> arises if you try to load a newer version of SQLite in a system >> where it is already installed. Uninstalling the old version is not >> always possible because of dependency issues. You can run versions >> side by side but you need to plan this carefully as it is possible >> to compile against the wrong libraries when building the new >> binary. That being said I use it as a light weight datastore. > > > True. But if you use Python 2.5, you don't need to care about > compiling your own SQLite. (Another battery included) > > > Greetlings from Lake Constance! > Hraban
Debian and Ubuntu tend to split up packages. Because of the splitting you don't get sqlite with your python 2.5 package included. There isn't something like the normal python 2.5 package in Debina/Ubuntu. See: http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/python/ Uwe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
