Steve Rose wrote:
> I was able to get two bzobjects working on the same table independently by
> using your technique of creating 2 fictitious datasource names and only
> adding the primary bzobj to the form. That was some black magic. The other
> method you suggested of not putting in the addField and friends statements I
> didn't quite get -- upper division work for sure! As long as I have a
> method that works, that's all that matters. Thanks for your brilliance
> again.
I'm glad you got it working. But why did everyone think I was
recommending not doing addField() I'll never understand. Here's the
subthread that started that:
{{{
Paul McNary wrote:
> > So the DataSource name doesn't have to match the table name?
> > They are just arbitrary descriptive names?
> > I was under the assumption yhat they were the actual table name. The
> > table(s) used are what is defined in the FROM statements in the biz
object?
> >
> > Do I understand correctly now?
If you never fill in addField() and friends, or you do but don't give it
an explicit table name, Dabo will use DataSource to determine the
backend table name.
Don't let Dabo do that. :)
}}}
Pretty explicit in my reading, that this wasn't a recommendation but an
explanation.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
