I have just reconsidered these schema issues with Postgres and now think 
making the schema name mandatory is not a good idea.

First, you can't easily reuse an app written for MySQL or SQLite because 
you will need to add "public." to every table (data source) name. 
Second, you sometimes want to have unqualified table names. This way you 
can, for instance, use tables/views living in the schema named after the 
current user instead of the public tables/views.

Therefore I just added a patch (http://trac.dabodev.com/ticket/1189) 
that makes schema names optional. It also improves some other issues 
with the Postgres code such as recognizing composite primary keys.

-- Christoph


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to