On Monday 19 January 2009 08:34:08 pm johnf wrote: > On Monday 19 January 2009 07:54:37 pm Paul McNett wrote: > > Yes, this is the preferred way of doing it when dealing with instances, > > but more often than not I define subclasses and do very little, if any, > > instance programming. So, I still usually explicitly call > > self.bindEvent(...) in my subclass afterInit method > > This implies you are not using RegID's. If you are. How do you get around > the issue of setting a RegID for an object in your subclass. For each > instance of the subclass you would be attempting to re-use the RegID - > which is a no-no. So would you expand on your statement. Not my day. The above got cut off.
Should have - Because I could really use a simple way to avoid the setting RegID's in subclasses and still have access to the objects in code. -- John Fabiani _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
