On Feb 24, 2011, at 7:08 AM, Werner F. Bruhin wrote:
> Shouldn't then all "mixin" type classes be treated/flagged that way?
>
> I'd prefer not:) as it means a lot more special treatment in the
> documentation, i.e. classes inheriting these mixin's should have methods
> documented from there, no?
Not necessarily. Most mixins are general purpose, such as dPemMixin,
while the two you cited were for use only within the particular script in which
they are defined. IOW, dPemMixin *is* designed to be used outside of where it
is defined (i.e., every UI class), whereas _dBasePanelMixin is only an
implementation detail of the dPanel classes.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
