I made sure about addChild(). My actual bizobj relations are similar to the following: biz1 is parent biz2 is child of biz1 biz3 & biz4 both are childs of biz2 I have specified like this: biz1.addChild(biz2) biz2.addChild(biz3) biz2.addChild(biz4) Other definitions (LinkField, FillLinkFromParent, nonUpdateFields) are in place. Is that correct? ---Vineet
________________________________ From: Paul McNett <[email protected]> To: Vineet Deodhar <[email protected]>; Dabo Users list <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, 12 October 2011, 19:18 Subject: Re: [dabo-users] parent: child: grandchild saveAll() On 10/12/11 1:30 AM, Vineet Deodhar wrote: > I have parent:child:grandchild relationship defined. > LinkField, FillLinkFromParent, AddChild are all specified. > > When there is no change in parent Bizobj and if changes are there in child& > grandchild bizobjs; > and I try to parentBizobj.saveAll(), nothing is saved. > > But if I do childBizobj.saveAll(), changes are saved correctly. > Surely, this is not expected behaviour. > From the docstrings of saveAll(), whenever saveAll() is called on parent >bizobj, it would check& commit all > changes/additions/deletions in self& all children. > > Any hint? I have lots of these - and deeper - relationships, and when the parent is saved everything is saved in the chain. Please make sure you've called addChild() on all of the parent/child relationships. In your case, make sure that you've called parent.addChild(child). Paul --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
