On 10/12/11 7:41 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > However, having looked over this, I think that we have two use cases: > when working with a cursor object directly, or when working with bizobjs. In > the former case, I think that the current behavior is correct: if you are > working at that level, you should control things directly. However, when > working with bizobjs, I think that the default should be to update the > internals, since you are expecting bizobj-like behavior, which insulates the > developer from the data layer underpinnings. > > Any objection to changing the default for updateInternals in the bizobj > method signature to True?
No objections here. Your analysis seems right. Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
