x-mailing-list: [email protected]
(Please include header and footer when redistributing this material.)
_________________________________________________________________
THE DAFYOMI DISCUSSION LIST
brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Yerushalayim
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
[email protected]
[REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE TO DISCUSS THE DAF WITH THE KOLLEL]
________________________________________________________________
Yevamos 076: Moavi v'Lo Moaviah
Davic1 asks:
A gute voch. Would you know a source I could read that explains why Yishai,
the head of the Sanhedrin, had the sefekos about a female Moavi, I.e. his
own grandmother Rus, when surely he knew the halacha just like his own
grandfather Boaz, etc.
Thanks
David Goldman
----------------------------------------------
The Kollel replies:
Regarding Boaz, the Maharsha and others on the Daf (77a) already discuss
the calculations of Boaz, and why they were perhaps different than the
average case. Additionally, I recommend reading through the Rama Mi’Pano’s
discussion about Yishai’s actions in Asara Ma’amaros (Ma’amar Chikur ha’Din
3:10). [I personally find that it is very useful to use the commentary of
the Yad Yehudah on the Rama Mi’Pano’s commentary.]
All the best,
Yaakov Montrose
(See also the Chidushim on the Torah of Rav Yitzchak Zev Soloveichik of
Brisk.- AP)
---
Davic1 asks:
In any case, once the true halacha was revealed by Boaz, then what place
was there for Yishai's safek?
Plus, isn't it surprising that even people such as Doeg and Sheva Ben
Bichri did not recognize the psak of Boaz, who had been the head of the
Sanhedrin in his day.....??
I was thinking that the doubt of Yishai was not about Moavi against Boaz,
but rather whether his son could be fit to be king since his father and he
might not be considered achicha, which a king must be, and therefore he did
not want to have another child from Nitzeves, I.e. David Hamelech.
----------------------------------------------
The Kollel replies:
Why wouldn’t they be considered Achicha if Boaz was correct? If you think
it is because a woman who is a Giyores cannot have a descendant who is a
king, even if her husband is a regular Jew, this is clearly incorrect. The
Kesef Mishnah (Melachim 1:4) says that this is clearly disproven from
Rechavam, who was the king after Shlomo, and whose mother was Na’amah
Ha’Amonis. This is why the Kesef Mishnah says that the Halachah is that as
long as one parent is not a Ger, whether it is the father or the mother,
the person is called Achicha. (Some bring a similar proof from Avshalom,
who was the son of an Eishes Yefas Toar, and we do not find any objection
against him ruling from Achitofel and the others who supported him).
All the best,
Yaakov Montrose
>>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><<<
The *D*AFYOMI *A*DVANCEMENT *F*ORUM, brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf
Write to us at [email protected] or visit us at http://www.dafyomi.co.il
Tel/Fax(US): 646-820-3315; Fax(Isr): (02) 591-6024; Tel(Isr): (02) 651-5004
_______________________________________________
Daf-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.shemayisrael.co.il/mailman/listinfo/daf-discuss_shemayisrael.co.il
