Please include header and footer when redistributing this material.)
_________________________________________________________________
THE DAFYOMI DISCUSSION LIST
brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Yerushalayim
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE TO DISCUSS THE DAF WITH THE KOLLEL]
________________________________________________________________
Ta-Shema vs. Meisevei
Mark Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
On the subject of syntax, I have long wondered the following point:
After a machlokes Amoraim, the Gemoro often tries to bring a support to one
side (which is a Kashe to the other side) from a Baraisa etc. Sometimes the
Gemoro introduces this with "To Sh'ma" and sometimes with "Meisivei". Is
there any pattern/rule to when each is used?
Mark Bergman
----------------------------------------------
The Kollel replies:
The general rule is that the Gemara uses "Ta Shema" when there is
*question* which is being resolved. "Meisevei" is used when presenting a
question on an already accepted rule or opinion.
However, the Sefarim of the "Kelalei ha'Shas" (such as Sefer Kerisus, Yad
Malachi, Halichos Olam etc.) cite many cases in which the terms are
interchanged. It seems that there indeed is no steadfast rule. (See for
example Sukah 10b. It would be enlightening to see the Girsa of the
Dikdukei Sofrim in all of the exceptions.)
D. Zupnik
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with this text in the body of the message:
unsubscribe daf-discuss