(Please include header and footer when redistributing this material.)
_________________________________________________________________
THE DAFYOMI DISCUSSION LIST
brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Yerushalayim
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE TO DISCUSS THE DAF WITH THE KOLLEL]
________________________________________________________________
Shevuos 024: Isur haBa'ah me'Atzmo
Mark Bergman asked:
On Shevuos 23b (bottom), Resh Lokish says that Kollel does not apply to
Issue Haba MeAtzmo.
On 24b, the Gemoro says that there is a Hava Amina that Kollel does not
apply to Issue Haba MeAtzmo, therefore...
Does the Gemoro just mean to exclude the opinion of Resh Lokish? (If so,
why not say so)
----------------------------------------------
The Kollel replies:
Reish Lakish does not express this opinion explicitly; rather, the Gemara
uses this Sevara to explain Reish Lakish's view. Therefore, the Gemara
mentions the Sevara rather than saying "l'Afukei m'Reish Lakish."
D. Zupnik
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with this text in the body of the message:
unsubscribe daf-discuss
