On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 08:19:44 +0100, "Paul Marquess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: Steve Hay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 20 October 2005 12:20 > > To: Steve Hay > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; Paul Marquess > > Subject: Re: Smoke [5.9.3] 25808 FAIL(F) MSWin32 WinXP/.Net SP2 (x86/2 > > cpu) > > > > Steve Hay wrote: > > > Automated smoke report for 5.9.3 patch 25808 > > > Mugwump.uk.radan.com: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.40GHz(~3391 MHz) > > (x86/2 cpu) > > > on MSWin32 - WinXP/.Net SP2 > > > using cl version 12.00.8804 > > > smoketime 10 hours 57 minutes (average 16 minutes 26 seconds) > > > > > > Summary: FAIL(F) > > [...] > > > ../lib/Archive/Tar/t/02_methods.t.......FAILED 16-23 26 > > > > I think these failures could be due to the new Compress-Zlib > > distribution in bleadperl. > > > > lib/Archive/Tar.pm was changed in 25312 (upgrading to 1.26) and hasn't > > been touched since. > > > > I have a bleadperl smoke report at 25698 in which all tests passed OK. > > > > Compress-Zlib then went through a period of crashing in blead on Win32. > > By the time it was fixed (change 25758), the Archive-Tar tests had > > started failing (e.g. the failure is in a smoke report at 25759). > > I assume that "Inconsistent test results (between TEST and harness)" means > you've tested it both via "make test" and by running t/TEST directly? No, it means that the smoke process reruns the failed tests from 'make test' under 'make test_harness', and if the results differ (fail in one but pass in the other), you get this message. Now that of course does not prevent the smoker from running the tests by hand :) > If so, how is t/TEST run? -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using Perl 5.6.2, 5.8.0, 5.8.5, & 5.9.2 on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00 & 11.11, AIX 4.3 & 5.2, SuSE 9.2 & 9.3, and Cygwin. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn Smoking perl: http://www.test-smoke.org, perl QA: http://qa.perl.org reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
