Op een mooie lentedag (Saturday 20 May 2006 09:40),schreef  Abe Timmerman:
> Automated smoke report for 5.9.4 patch 28236
> idefix: MIPS R4600 Processor Chip Revision: 2.0 (133 MHZ) (IP22/1 cpu)
>     on        irix - 6.2
>     using     gcc version 2.7.2.2
>     smoketime 14 hours 30 minutes (average 3 hours 37 minutes)
>
> Summary: FAIL(Xm)
>
> O = OK  F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
> X = Failure(s) under TEST but not under harness
> ? = still running or test results not (yet) available
> Build failures during:       - = unknown or N/A
> c = Configure, m = make, M = make (after miniperl), t = make test-prep
>
>    28236     Configuration (common) -Dcc=gcc
> ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------
> X X m -
> X X m -     -Duse64bitint
> | | | +----- PERLIO = perlio -DDEBUGGING
> | | +------- PERLIO = stdio  -DDEBUGGING
> | +--------- PERLIO = perlio
> +----------- PERLIO = stdio

From the smokelog for the DEBUGGING builds:

make ...          CCCMD =  gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -DPERL_PATCHNUM=28236 
-DDEBUGGING 
-D_BSD_TYPES -D_BSD_TIME -DIRIX32_SEMUN_BROKEN_BY_GCC -DDEBUGGING -pipe -I/
usr/local/include -DLANGUAGE_C -O3 -g  -Wall
          CCCMD =  gcc -DPERL_CORE -c -DPERL_PATCHNUM=28236 -DDEBUGGING 
-D_BSD_TYPES -D_BSD_TIME -DIRIX32_SEMUN_BROKEN_BY_GCC -DDEBUGGING -pipe -I/
usr/local/inc
lude -DLANGUAGE_C -O3 -g  -Wall
gv.c: In function `Perl_gv_fetchmethod_autoload':
gv.c:573: invalid use of non-lvalue array
gv.c: In function `Perl_gv_fullname4':
gv.c:1282: invalid use of non-lvalue array
gv.c: In function `Perl_gv_check':
gv.c:1361: invalid use of non-lvalue array
gv.c: In function `Perl_Gv_AMupdate':
gv.c:1537: invalid use of non-lvalue array
gv.c:1564: invalid use of non-lvalue array
Unable to make perl in this configuration

HTH +
Good luck,

Abe
-- 
Merijn> We *do* need tests (I am not good in tests: hint hint)

Calling all happy passive readers of perl5-porters - submit a patch, get your 
name into the AUTHORS file: fame, immortality and more spam.
                                      -- Nicholas Clark on p5p @ 2004-01-22

Reply via email to