Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > On 17/07/06, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Can it be that -std=c89 isn't that good an idea after all? >>> This morning I disabled Cygwin, Now I should disable HP-UX 10.20. >> The -std=c89 works for me in >> * Debian 3.1 x86 - gcc 3.3.5 > > There are many glibc versions out there, and in many of them I've > spotted anonymous unions, C++ comments, or other things that makes > them incompatible with standard compilers (or even non-gcc compilers.) > I'd rather disable this for linux completely. (Maybe that means it's > not worth enabling it at all...)
Oh, crap. Yes, please remove the -std=c89 sections from cflags.SH and perlhack.pod, then. *goes off to sulk under the bridge* >
