Steve Hay sent out: > Automated smoke report for 5.8.8 patch 28443 > Warning W8019 threads.xs 456: Code has no effect in function > Perl_ithread_create > Warning W8019 threads.xs 462: Code has no effect in function > Perl_ithread_create > Warning W8019 threads.xs 487: Code has no effect in function > Perl_ithread_create > Warning W8019 threads.xs 656: Code has no effect in function Perl_ithread_join > Warning W8019 shared.xs 358: Code has no effect in function > Perl_sharedsv_associate > Warning W8019 shared.xs 381: Code has no effect in function > Perl_sharedsv_associate > Warning W8019 shared.xs 604: Code has no effect in function > sharedsv_scalar_mg_dup > Warning W8019 shared.xs 620: Code has no effect in function > sharedsv_scalar_mg_local > Warning W8019 shared.xs 768: Code has no effect in function > sharedsv_elem_mg_dup > Warning W8019 shared.xs 838: Code has no effect in function > sharedsv_array_mg_copy > Warning W8019 shared.xs 848: Code has no effect in function > sharedsv_array_mg_dup > Warning W8019 shared.xs 948: Code has no effect in function > S_threads__shared__tie_PUSH > Warning W8019 shared.xs 968: Code has no effect in function > S_threads__shared__tie_UNSHIFT > Warning W8019 shared.xs 1321: Code has no effect in function > XS_threads__shared_bless
All of the above stem from using the SvREFCNT_inc() macro in a void context. Would adding (void) in front of these suppress these warnings? Should I submit a patch for that?
