On 07/11/06, Steve Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 05:18:31PM -0000, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> "H.Merijn Brand" wrote in perl.daily-build.reports :
> > 29220 Configuration (common) none
> > ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------
> > O O O O O F
> > O O O O O F -Duse64bitint
> > O O O O O F -Duselongdouble
> > O O O O O F -Dusemorebits
>
> Do those failures mean that Dave's fix was incomplete, and should we
> reinstate a workaround similar at patches 29182 and 29184 ?
>
> (note that I don't reproduce the failures on Linux, so I'd appreciate
> more details)
>
> > O O O O O O -Duseithreads
> > O O O O O O -Duseithreads -Duse64bitint
> > O O O O O O -Duseithreads -Duselongdouble
> > O O O O O O -Duseithreads -Dusemorebits
> >| | | | | +- LC_ALL = en_US.utf8 -DDEBUGGING
> >| | | | +--- PERLIO = perlio -DDEBUGGING
> >| | | +----- PERLIO = stdio -DDEBUGGING
> >| | +------- LC_ALL = en_US.utf8
> >| +--------- PERLIO = perlio
> > +----------- PERLIO = stdio
> >
> > Locally applied patches:
> > DEVEL
> > SMOKE29220
> >
> > Failures: (common-args) none
> > [en_US.utf8] -DDEBUGGING
> > [en_US.utf8] -DDEBUGGING -Duse64bitint
> > [en_US.utf8] -DDEBUGGING -Duselongdouble
> > [en_US.utf8] -DDEBUGGING -Dusemorebits
> > ../lib/strict.t.........................FAILED 84-85
> > ../lib/subs.t...........................FAILED 2
> > ../lib/warnings.t.......................FAILED 123-124 138 145-147 155
158 310
> > 455 499-500
> > ../t/run/fresh_perl.t...................FAILED 48
I'm getting similar failures with Solaris, but, so far, I've not been
able to reproduce from a command-line.
Remember that you must set PERL_UNICODE="" to reproduce the smoke
environment, and PERL_DESTRUCT=2 if run manually.
