2009/8/25 Craig Berry <[email protected]>: > > On Tuesday, August 25, 2009, at 10:12AM, "Nicholas Clark" <[email protected]> > wrote: >>On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:08:25AM -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote: >>> Automated smoke report for 5.11.0 patch >>> e00b8fdab69f4407fc00c983beddd087eb4e3205 blead-1995-ge00b8fd >> >>That commit hash doesn't exist, which makes it rather tricky for me to work >>out what your smoker has got to. (Although I think from the failures below, >>it has tested blead with those changes to t/TEST to remove File::Spec) > > Yes, I saw your change on gitweb before kicking off a smoke run. > >>Does anyone have a good idea where that hash is coming from? > > See Dave M.'s previous post to p5p with a subject line similar to "smokers 20 > commits ahead of blead" or something like that and my post of a couple of > days ago on fiveperl about the rsync mirror getting further and further ahead > of the main git repo in number of commits but without differences in the > code. Well, actually you don't need to see those posts because they ask > essentially the same question you are asking. Until someone who knows where > the rsync repo is located and/or how it does its updates steps up and takes a > look at what's going on we'll continue to have useless SHA1s in the smoke > reports.
I guess that would be me. Ill try to poke but I'm on holiday right now, and the beach alas does not have wifi (or as the French say "wee-fee") Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
