On Tue 24 Feb 2004 12:52, "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue 24 Feb 2004 11:09, "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ../ext/IPC/SysV/t/ipcsysv.t 1 256 16 32 200.00% 1-16
> > > ../ext/IPC/SysV/t/msg.t 0 12 ?? ?? % ??
> > > ../ext/IPC/SysV/t/sem.t 0 12 ?? ?? % ??
> > > ../lib/ExtUtils/t/Install.t 0 139 ?? ?? % ??
> > > ../lib/IPC/SysV.t 1 256 16 32 200.00% 1-16
> > > op/sysio.t 39 1 2.56% 39
> > > op/taint.t 0 12 223 148 66.37% 150-223
> > > 50 tests and 514 subtests skipped.
> > > Failed 7/872 test scripts, 99.20% okay. 107/80975 subtests failed, 99.87% okay.
> >
> >
> > For IPC function without cygipc, the cygserver needs to run during the
> > test runs.
>
> IIRC Yitzchak was about to change the test to skip the test if the server was
> not running.
Sorry for the speedy follow up
On second though, how feasible is it to
if (cygserver_running ()) {
do_tests ();
}
elif (cygserver_installed ()) {
start_cygserver ();
do_tests ();
stop_cygserver ();
}
else {
skip_tests ();
}
or is this too much of a security risk?
--
H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.0, & 5.9.x, and 806 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, 11i,
AIX 4.3, SuSE 8.2, and Win2k. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn/
http://archives.develooper.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
send smoke reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], QA: http://qa.perl.org
