On Mon 09 Aug 2004 21:29, Abe Timmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Op een hete zomerdag (Monday 09 August 2004 20:22), schreef H.Merijn Brand:
> 
> > On Mon 09 Aug 2004 20:14, Abe Timmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (by way of Abe 
> Timmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> > > Automated smoke report for 5.9.2 patch 23203
> > > hector: PA8500 (PA-2.0/32/1 cpu)
> > >     on        hp-ux - 11.11/64
> >
> > Wow, he's got it running!
> 
> Yup, thanks heaps! I wouldn't have been able to do it without you.

So the most recent links I gave you were the right one's?

> > >     using     gcc version 3.4.1
> > >     smoketime 22 hours 50 minutes (average 1 hour 25 minutes)
> >
> > A PA8500 being this slow???? What's wrong? only 128 Mb of memory?
> 
> (from the syslog it looks like 512MB)
> Aug  5 07:17:43 hector vmunix: Memory Information:
> Aug  5 07:17:43 hector vmunix:     physical page size = 4096 bytes, logical 
> page size = 4096
>  bytes
> Aug  5 07:17:43 hector vmunix:     Physical: 524288 Kbytes, lockable: 382520 
> Kbytes, availab
> le: 439652 Kbytes
> 
> -bash-2.05b# model
> 9000/785/C360

Ahh, it's a workstation, not a server. (7xx is workstation, 8xx is server)
different architecture, different performance.

> dunno about speed though (not very good at this HPUX stuff)
> 
> >     smoketime 18 hours 41 minutes (average 2 hours 20 minutes)
> > d3  HP-UX 10.20/32 U  9000/800/D390 PA8000/240 pa-2.0  512 Mb
> >
> > that's a 240 Mhz PA8000
> 
> Hmmm, it looks like my 5.8.5 smoke was much faster (avg 42 minutes per 
> config):
> 
>       http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.daily-build.reports/19848
> 
> Any pointers?

No. Don't run two smokes at the same time, and you'd be fine I think.
42 minutes is rather good.

-- 
H.Merijn Brand        Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.3, & 5.9.x, and 809 on  HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, 11i,
   AIX 4.3, SuSE 9.0, and Win2k.           http://www.cmve.net/~merijn/
http://archives.develooper.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
send smoke reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], QA: http://qa.perl.org


Reply via email to