On 25 Jan 2011, at 4:58, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Not popular among Apple die-hards, but: > > "Apple software the most insecure: Secunia" > - > http://www.examiner.com/technology-in-national/apple-software-the-most-insecure-secunia > > "Apple the new world leader in software insecurity" > - > http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2010/07/apple-the-new-world-leader-in-software-insecurity.ars > > "Apple has the most insecure software in the world" > - > http://www.techeye.net/security/apple-has-the-most-insecure-software-in-the-world > > In an effort to suppress the [potential] war, the problems cited are > not with Mac OS X. The issues appear to be present with other Apple > software.
I have a few questions about this. First, these aren't three reports, but three references to one and the same report from Secunia. Secondly, you say that the issues appear to be present with "other Apple software", while all three references above talk about "third party software". Is that the same thing? Thirdly, if the problems are so rampant, why is nothing actually going wrong with the systems? I'm pretty sure that if any Apple systems were actually compromised, we'd hear about it loud and clear. It seems they weren't, or did I miss something? Please note, I didn't read the original one and only Secunia report, only the reports of the report you report. _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
