I think it is kind of simple and goes from specific to general: 1. 5 year hacking plan is the same as your next 6 month hacking plan. Industry trends shift slowly and Fortune 100 doesn't change that quickly - the decline often is a slow dive. At this level, you hack have a list of specific organisations.
2. At 10 years, changes in industry may be significant, so it is better to focus on a segment, like Defence or Biomed or X. If you trojan a few important systems now, it is likely they will be around (or your access to their successors will) for a while. Company names may change, but the research will be sold & acquired & divested as divisions - those will stick around. 3. At 50 years, a lot will change - countries may rise & fall, we may be wearing space suits and neural implants or sporting an extra pair of arms. However, thinking inertia won't. It is best to hack attitudes & cultures. Convincing an enemy to invest in technology that you know will be useless in 20 years (e.g. US Littoral Combat Ship) or adopting a really bad policy (e.g. giving bad education to people or plundering their savings) will be truly a strategic advantage. -- Konrads Smelkovs Applied IT sorcery. On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Dave Aitel <[email protected]> wrote: > In my imaginary hacking strategy class the first essay question is this: > 1. What would you build now that would let you hack into what you want to > hack into in five years? > 2. Ten years from now? > 3. Fifty years from now? > If you already know what you want to hack into five years from now, you're a > rare person, no? > -dave > > _______________________________________________ > Dailydave mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave > > _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
