On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Yiorgos Adamopoulos <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting. Geers's "Strategic Cyber Security" deal with the case of > a Cyber Arms Control Treaty ( http://www.ccdcoe.org/278.html ) and > more specifically compares it to the Chemical Weapons Convention. It > puts a lot of convincing effort on why a Cyber Arms Convention is hard > to succeed.
from the strategic cyber security web page: "There are two primary reasons why IPv6 scores well in this research. First, as a technology, IPv6 is more resistant to outside influence than the other proposed strategies, particularly deterrence and arms control, which should make it a more reliable investment. Second, IPv6 addresses the most significant advantage of cyber attackers today – anonymity." Do you know what this is referring to? In what ways is it expected that ipv6 will address anonymity? Is there a particular IPv6 technology that the author anticipates will be deployed with IPv6? > http://gr.linkedin.com/in/yiorgos _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
