On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Dave Aitel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > But you're getting one, *very* important thing when you use Python: > > 1. Your most complex code will be a lot less buggy. > > For advanced remote access trojans, you are operating in a completely unknown > environment and frankly, you may NEVER be able to update it or reach it > again. Any detection or failure could be globally catastrophic. This means > your code has to be forward thinking in a way that is not typical. So it > simply has to be much more correct than code usually is. and here I was thinking Haskell. > People tend to write complex things more CORRECTLY in Python than in Ruby or > Lua or (Naudhubillah!) C. That reason alone is why the future of remote > access trojans is embedded Python engines. If you're trying to build trojans > that have emergent behavior, then you need a language that makes that > behavior as clear and easy to understand as possible. > again Haskell ;). I've always viewed emergent behavior as the behavior that occurs when a large number of well defined objects (usually small) interact. An example might be a number of INNUENDO nodes that dynamically form an overlay network for exfil. IMHO the only behavior that emerges from complex code is behavior we DON'T want. _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
