Interesting! But will mind-reading to reconstruct faces from memories be faster?
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5049255 DNA hacking vs. mind reading hacking - which will win? I suppose the use cases will differ - DNA hacking to reconstruct faces won't require a witness, while surgery could significantly alter actual appearances such that tapping into living recording devices would be more accurate as an ID tool. Katie Sent from my Windows Phone ------------------------------ From: Dave Aitel <[email protected]> Sent: 4/1/2014 11:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Dailydave] The Source So, although Katie disagreed with me back in October when this got posted, I wanted to point out this interesting article: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22129613.600-genetic-mugshot-recreates-faces-from-nothing-but-dna.html#.Uzr_1_ldXAs ;> -dave On 10/31/2013 2:32 PM, Dave Aitel wrote: So, to continue today's email flood, one thing I've been thinking about, as it pertains to cyberweapons, is of course, the original information virus of them all: DNA. First of all, I think it's pretty clear databases exist that are wide enough and complete enough (and covert enough) that a complete family tree of almost everyone in certain regions exists. Likewise, I'm pretty sure you (for certain values of "you") can take any given DNA sample and back-port it to a picture of that person. DNA databases are almost by definition hugely scary. I don't know if they qualify as "cyber weapons" in and of themselves, but they're close. -dave _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing [email protected]https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
