Daniel, On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Daniel Clemens <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) United Stated Trade Commission - Investigation No. 332-519 USITC > Publication 4226, May 2011 > 2) The committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) - PDF > Name RL33388.pdf, published January 2nd, 2014. > 3) Investigative Report on US National Security Issues Posed by Chinese > Telecommunications Companies Huawei and ZTE - October 8th, 2012 "Huawei-ZTE > Investigative Report (FINAL).pdf) > 4) China's Competiveness; CSIS Hills Nathanial Ahrens
I'll dispute that these cited references are propaganda as they lack tangible evidence and are further negated by the recent unproven allegation of the NSA involving Huawei. As I have stated previously I believe Huawei may have created this unfortunate situation for themselves in resisting the Common Criteria product listing and their position may have some merit based on the "evaluation" market that has been created by a military standard that moves slower than that of a private enterprise and vulnerability markets for that matter. In hindsight it may have been cheaper for Huawei to not have publicly disrupted the CC market and absorbed this as a cost of doing business. However, Huawei may recover some revenue based on the continued circulation in the media of the unproven allegation against the NSA. -- Regards, Christian Heinrich http://cmlh.id.au/contact _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
