Guys please can we not discuss this, I'd hate people to think that freedom of speech should trump fireeye's proprietary IP, built almost entirely on codebases written by others...
-- Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse any brevity or typos. > On 11 Sep 2015, at 14:27, Dave Aitel <[email protected]> wrote: > > The real question in security is always how to play Poker against an > opponent who can see all your cards. > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/09/10/fireeye-slammed-over-injunction/ > https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/dailydave/2013-March/000353.html > > In a way our "IP" laws have confused a lot of us about security. What if > NOBODY TALKED ABOUT OUR WEAKNESSES BECAUSE IT WAS ILLEGAL, the > management teams say. This, of course, directly relates to the > "regulation is GOING to happen" Wassenaar crowd because it's the exact > same fundamental psychology at work. "We're going to regulate away the > threat" is as useless as saying "hackers won't buy our boxes to find out > how to bypass our defenses". > > -dave > > > _______________________________________________ > Dailydave mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
