On 15/12/2012 22:28, David Precious wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:29:09 +0000
gvim <[email protected]> wrote:
I like a lot about Dancer 1 but I don't like the PHP-ish style of
having all the helper kewords/functions in the global namespace.
That's Dancer's DSL, and is a fairly core part of what Dancer is. Some
people dislike DSLs, but a lot of people do like and enjoy it, and it
certainly makes for clear and expressive code, no?
_______________________________________________
dancer-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
Just realised I may be missing the obvious - if Dancer was object oriented you
wouldn't have:
get '/routename' => sub { };
... but rather something like:
my $d = Dancer->new;
$d->get('/routname', $subref);
gvim
_______________________________________________
dancer-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
