On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, sawyer x wrote:
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Henk van Oers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, sawyer x wrote:
So Dancer::App and Dancer::Plugin are really not the same.
I told you so.
I thought you meant that if people can use Dancer::Plugin, why can't they use
Dancer::App.
I probably misunderstood.
(And Dancer::App is not a namespace yet, see: locate)
Dancer/App.pm is used internally. That's why Dancer/App/* is a problem.
Dancer/Plugin/* is not because it's meant for that
purpose.
Let me ask for an other namespace: Dancer::Loadapp
I don't think that's good either.
Why not?
Why can't this be a plugin, by the way?
I told you so.
_______________________________________________
dancer-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
