--From: dancer-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Sawyer X
--Sent: 19 July 2015 00:31
--To: Perl Dancer users mailing list
--Subject: Re: [dancer-users] JSON Serialiser
--I don't understand this email. T abundance of HTML in your message is quite
disruptive.
------
My apologies for the confusion. Let me try again…..
I had code which was working just fine two months ago. It relied on the
automatic JSON deserialise + blessed objects. I was able to "return" a Moo
object as a response to a REST request and the output would correctly show the
json. So the basic format for this is:
get '/xxxx' => sub {
return AnObject->new;
};
AnObject has TO_JSON implemented.
I came back to this project after 2 months and found that it no longer worked -
I would get an error of the form " Unrecognized response type from route". I
found a thread from April 15th which showed the same issue and a solution.
(this is what I tried to include!). The solution was to wrap the response
object in a hash as below:
get '/xxxx' => sub {
return { result => AnObject->new };
};
My question is: which should be the correct way. My previous way worked and
then something must have changed. Was the change deliberate? I have no issue
with the solution above, I just want to understand whether this is the expected
behaviour now.
Z
_______________________________________________
dancer-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
