David Golden, Would you have an updated opinion now, 18 months later? I too am considering Dancer, the alternative being Meteor, but not if basic changes keep coming.
Niels Larsen On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 15:58 -0500, David Golden wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Also, I consider D2 to still be alpha quality. > > > > Can you please elaborate on which problems/bugs/etc. you ran into with > > Dancer2 > > that make you say that? > > It's not stable. The API and internal architecture is still a work in > progress. E.g. look at the 0.11 changes to redirect and forward. > These *are* improvements (fixing the regressions that broke saving > sessions in a hook), but the overall rate of change is still high > enough that I deem Dancer2 "alpha" quality. > > David > > _______________________________________________ dancer-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
