На Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:54:37 +0200
sawyer x <[email protected]> записано:
> This seems like a well thought-out idea, but unfortunately I think it
> shouldn't be done.
> Dancer 2 is already completely OO and so is the DSL. The idea now is to
> simply keep Dancer 1 maintained as far as to let Dancer 2 be developed
> continually. Once Dancer 2 is ready, we'll start moving to it. It will
> already contain all the things people suggest to put into Dancer 1, being
> done more cleanly and correctly.
Moving to dancer 2 could be a big issue. And afaik dancer 2 simply is not ready.
Meanwhile people may want to write modules.
This approach is simple and can be used with an existing code base.
--
С уважением,
Роман Галеев,
+7 347 2-900-145
www.ncom-ufa.ru
_______________________________________________
Dancer-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
