Starman has some performance benchmarking here<https://metacpan.org/module/Starman#PERFORMANCE>but they don't include Apache. I guess it also matters what extensions you have on Apache and how well it's configured. I am surprised it gets you better performance than Starman...
It would be interesting to raise this on irc.perl.org's #plack and see what they think. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:59 AM, David C gurugeek <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello again, > I am running this page > > http://dancer.1.ai using > plackup -E deployment -s Starman --workers=10 -p 5001 -a ./bin/app.pl > > > and this page > http://elephant.1.ai/perl using Plack::Handler::Apache2 > > in my tests Plack::Handler::Apache2 seems to be faster. Shouldn't it be > the other way around ? > I did try both with curl + safari and chrome benchmarks and even > http://whichloadsfaster.com :) > Thanks for your comments > Regards > David > _______________________________________________ > Dancer-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users >
_______________________________________________ Dancer-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
