On 09/25/2012 04:34 PM, David Cantrell wrote:Yes. Yes. Yes.On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:24:31PM +0100, Alex C wrote:On 23 September 2012 01:27, gvim <[email protected]> wrote:I'm converting a CGI::Application web app to Dancer and have always used a modular approach so am I missing something if I prefer to do it this way:I think this is a very nice technique. My Routes.pm is growing to 3000 lines and I think I will refactor it using this same technique you have suggested.Dancer is great at route creation and dispatch, session management etc - the web-specific bits of an app. But that's *all* it's good at (which is a good thing). I want to keep it the hell out of my application code! Amen. |
_______________________________________________ Dancer-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
