On 6/8/12 8:25 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Tony Finch wrote: > >> On 8 Jun 2012, at 23:18, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 6/8/12 4:00 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: >>> >>>> 3: Will we do the "DANE with $foo" work in this WG or should it be >>>> individual submissions? >>> >>> Another option is to complete such work in other working groups where >>> applicable (e.g., the "DANE with XMPP" might best be completed in the >>> XMPP WG), with appropriate review from the DANE WG. >> >> I think it is best to keep them all here so we can try to make them as >> similar as possible. > > > Further, there is no WG for SMTP. Dead, revived, dead, revived, dead again > for many years.
I did say "where applicable". :) As long as all the appropriate folks review each spec, I don't particularly care which WG acronym shows up in the draft name... Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
