On Jun 8, 2012, at 5:08 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Hi all, > > There are a number of questions that came out of the IESG Evaluation on > draft-ietf-dane-protocol-21 that we would like the WG input on… > > I am not going to try summarize the discussions / views -- the discussions > are short and / or subtle enough that you should read them yourself if you > have an opinion / want more details. > > Unless we hear SCOAT (Strong Clear Objections with Alternate Text) by > Wednesday June 13th we will remove the old text.
Awesome, we heard no SCOAT, but we did hear a Scott, who provided useful background, and is cool with removing the text.\\ So, authors, please remove the old text. W > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Based on the briefing in the SAAG Session at IETF 83, I strongly > suggest that this text be removed from Section 6. > > At the time this is written, it is expected that there will be a new > family of hash algorithms called SHA-3 within the next few years. > It is expected that some of the SHA-3 algorithms will be mandatory > and/or recommended for TLSA records after the algorithms are fully > defined. At that time, this specification will be updated. > > ------------------------------------------- > > If folk disagree with removing this text, please read the SAAG minutes > (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/minutes/minutes-83-saag.txt), Tim's > presentation on the SHA-3 Competition > (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-saag-0.pdf) and maybe > the audio archives as well. > > <no hat> > In case it wasn't obvious I too think this should be pulled. Speculating > about the future gets us into tricky territory as does committing future folk > to do stuff. If we mention that SHA-3 is coming and we'll rev the draft then, > do we also need to mention SHA-4? SHA-17? SHA-33.3? OMG, when will the > madness stop?! ….Sorry, got a little carried away there…. > > </no hat> > > W > -- > American Non-Sequitur Society; > we don't make sense, but we do like pizza! > > For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. -- H. L. Mencken _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
