On Sep 10, 2012, at 3:22 PM, James Cloos <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on adopting. > > As for the draft, do we really need a new RR? > > If the content is the same as TLSA, just with a different naming scheme, > why not just use TLSA?
Because the semantics of the record are different. The TLSA record was specifically defined for TLS. > A requirement to update dns software for every new use case might be an > excessive burden on the community. Could be, but overloading the TLSA record could have bad side-effects as well. I would rather err on the side of safety here. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
