In general, I support the idea of what this document is trying to do. But there are a couple of problems with their concrete approach. Without delving into a full review…
-- The algorithm for domain names is really insufficient. For example, I have the email address [email protected] -- how do the dots get encoded? I realize that the DNS wire format allows labels to have dots, but good luck making most libraries make that query. -- I don't really see why we need a new RR type here, beyond the cognitive dissonance caused by the three letters "TLS". So I guess that's a vote in general favor, but maybe another rev wouldn't hurt. --Richard -- Richard Barnes Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Friday, September 21, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > Dear WG, > > > > This draft has already revived some comment (and has been revised to > > incorporate / address those), so I'm assuming that there will be sufficient > > interest to adopt, but for the form of the thing: > > > > This starts a call for adoption of draft-hoffman-dane-smime. > > Please provide feedback as to if you would like this draft adopted by Sept > > 17th, 2012. > > > > > We have discussed this, and see sufficient interest for adopting this draft > -- would the authors please re-submit as draft-dane-? > > W > > > > > W > > > > -- > > Never criticize a man till you've walked a mile in his shoes. Then if he > > didn't like what you've said, he's a mile away and barefoot. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane > >
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
