On 28 Sep 2012, at 09:22, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 25. 9. 2012, at 18:32, Henry Story <[email protected]> wrote: >> But that is exactly what WebID makes simple: > [...snip...] > > With my chair hat on, I would prefer you to stop promoting unrelated > technology unless you prove it's somehow related to work in this working > group. To say the truth I have seen too many emails in this WG to be reading > about what WebID does and what doesn't, I just don't care (here). Either > make some clear the connection to our charter or please stop and let us focus > on the work which _can_ be done in this WG.
??? I don't think I have been posting anything here for the past few days. The discussion has moved on the the WebID Community group in the mean time: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2012Sep/thread.html Anyway, I am very keen on DANE being adopted widely. It is a very important standard. The work we are doing would be hugely enhanced by it. As I said it is likely that we work done here to use DANE for Mime could be combined with WebID to go even further. Sincerely, Henry Story > > O. > -- > Ondřej Surý -- Chief Science Officer > ------------------------------------------- > CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratoře CZ.NIC > Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic > mailto:[email protected] http://nic.cz/ > tel:+420.222745110 fax:+420.222745112 > ------------------------------------------- > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
