Paul, > The IETF is not a protocol promotion body. We do it sometimes, but often with > bad results.
Good point... and I realize that my first idea listed is well off in the "promotion" area. Perhaps a better/safer area to discuss would be "are there technical issues or barriers that would prevent DANE from being deployed?" > That proposed agenda is much more in the realm of Internet Society work than > IETF work. Perhaps you should talk to people at ISOC about hosting an meeting > to discuss these things? :-) (smiling) I assume by the :-) that you know that these kind of deployment issues are precisely what I am employed by the Internet Society to work on via the Deploy360 Programme. So yes, my brain is kind of hard-wired into looking at "creating these standards is nice, but how do we get people to actually *use* them?" Certainly ISOC *could* hold a meeting to discuss how to get DANE more widely deployed ... and the people that would need to be at that meeting would be, well, probably pretty much many of the people who would be at the DANE working group meeting at IETF! Regards, Dan -- Dan York [email protected] http://www.danyork.me/ skype:danyork Phone: +1-802-735-1624 Twitter - http://twitter.com/danyork
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
