+1 to that And it is usually a good idea to find out the intent of a patent filer before sounding of about monopolists and such.
One of the sad facts about our industry is that the patent system is a prisoner's dilema game with a huge number of prisoners. Not patenting an idea means someone else will try. Lets get facts before making accusations on any other lists either. If the WG has not discussed the practical question of how to transfer DNSSEC domains from one registrar to another on the DNSEXT list then that possibly raises the question of whether the spec has been properly vetted. [I did work for VeriSign in the past but this application was made after my time there and there have been significant management changes since.] On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > No hats, because I am not a WG chair here, but: > > Could this discussion move to a list where it is more appropriate? There > is *nothing* about transferring hosting of domains with DNSSEC that is more > relevant to the DANE WG than, say, DNSEXT or DNSOP. It is even more > relevant on the IETF general mailing than here. If anything useful comes of > this thread, it will be missed by some of those who should see it if it is > in this WG. > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane > -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
