On 11/14/12 11:30 AM, "Paul Wouters" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> >I think CT is a bandaid for PKIX that does not apply to DANE. I thought the point was that DANE would not be allowed to do "an end run" around CT so logging DANE stuff was necessary, not that DANE necessarily had the same needs as the web PKI. _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
