-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/20/12 10:17 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Dear DANE Working Group, > > This starts a 4-week (because of time of year) consensus call on > adopting draft-fanf-dane-mua-00 as a DANE WG document.
I have no objections to adopting this work in the DANE WG, but given how similar this spec is in concept to draft-miller-xmpp-dnssec-prooftype (indeed, Matt Miller and I had talked with Tony about the possibility of merging our efforts), I am wondering what is the best way to ensure harmony between the MUA recommendations and the XMPP recommendations. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDrZdUACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzi9QCgsyCzFdw03IQYMX1PnZ4C3NSQ c7kAoOd4k6NZ+6EFS4BFa5T5ahuv3Vdk =IOPH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
