On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 07:09:14PM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > The choice should be up to the server owner, and there is no reason > for the client (really clients collectively by enforcing name checks > in sufficient numbers) to take away this choice.
I think this boils down to the usual philosophical issue about whether the party whose interests are to be most protected is the client or the server. My own view is that it is entirely legitimate for the client to be in control here, because it is never possible for a server to assert anything that a client must do. A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
